Welcome Visitor. Today is Saturday, April 20, 2024. Sign-on
Follow Us On Facebook
House Bill 1- the Special Session's Only Legislation
UPDATE: Senate votes 35-1 for passage of House Bill 1 on Friday morning. After a review of the provisions of the bill by Sen. Gary Tapp and remarks that amounted to "this is the best we can do and we can't mess with it", Senators passed the legislation sent to it by the House unmarked.

As expected, a few minutes after the Senate adjourned, the House also passed the bill in record time.

Rep. Brent Yonts emailed out this primer on retirement reform:
Five things to know:
 
·                    The House led the way. House Bill 1 uses House Bill 600 from the 2008 Regular Session as a foundation, but it is even better than that original proposal, because of bipartisan efforts. HB 1 passed on Wed. by a vote of 98-0 and is expected to be passed overwhelmingly in the Senate on Friday.
 
·                    HB 1 mainly affects employees hired after Sept. 1st. That includes state and local government employees and classified school personnel (cafeteria workers, bus drivers, janitors, etc.).  New teachers hired after July 1st will see more minor changes.
 
·                    This special session is necessary: The 30-year unfunded liability stands at $26 billion, and is growing by $800 million a year. Waiting until 2009 would cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars in the long run, versus $300,000 for this special session. If we do nothing, experts say the system would run dry in 10-15 years, causing a severe hardship and/or high taxes to cover the retirement costs. HB 1 stabilizes the system, but it will not erase the liability; only increased employer contributions and better investment returns will do that. HB 1 has a funding schedule to bring us to full funding by 2025.
 
·                    Cities, counties, and school boards will benefit immediately: For the upcoming year, their contribution rate will be lowered, resulting in a one-year savings of nearly $56 million. (For school boards, this savings is for classified workers only)
 
·                    Current state and local government employees will see two key changes: A different COLA, and no more double-dipping for returning retirees, who in many cases will have to wait longer to return.
 
Current Employee Changes:
 
·        Different COLA: In July 2009, the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) will be set at 1.5 percent, the same rate teachers have had for years. This can be raised by future General Assemblies, however, but only as long as the added COLA is funded at that time. Currently, COLAs are based on the Consumer Price Index.
 
·        No “double dipping”: Current employees who want to retire and return to work in state or local government will see new limitations after Sept. 1. For those in non-hazardous positions, they will have to wait three months instead of the current one before they can return. They also will be barred from starting a new retirement. Instead, a returning employee will continue drawing retirement and the new paycheck. The employee will not have to contribute to the retirement system, however, so that could be comparable to a 5 percent raise.
 
·        There is one exception to this rule: Hazardous duty workers will only have to wait one month rather than three before returning, but only if the second job is also classified as hazardous duty. For example, this would cover a retiring Kentucky State Police officer wanting to become a sheriff’s deputy. There would still be no second retirement.
 
Changes for NEW employees (Non-hazardous):
 
·                    State and local government employees (and classified school workers) hired after Sept. 1st will continue paying 5 percent of their salary to retirement, which will be refundable, but they will also have to pay 1 percent into a non-refundable health plan.
 
·                    The earliest they can retire with full benefits is 57. They must also meet the “Rule of 87,” which says their age and years of service add up to that figure. They can also receive unreduced retirement at age 65 with five years of service, or a reduced retirement at age 60 with 10 years of service. Current employees can retire with full benefits once they have 27 years of service, no matter their age.
 
·                    The multiplier used in determining retirement for NEW employees will depend on their years of service. Current employees base their retirement on 2 percent a year for every year they work. These new employees, however, will have a sliding rate that increases the longer they work. Those with less than 10 years of service will have a multiplier of 1.10 percent. Those with more than 26 but less than 30 years will have a 1.75 percent multiplier. ONLY those years over 30 will be eligible for the 2 percent multiplier.
 
·        How this works: An employee hired after Sept. 1 works for 35 years, and his final five-year average salary is $80,000. For these first 30 years, his retirement will be based on a 1.75 percent multiplier, netting him $42,000 annually.  Those extra five years will be calculated with a 2 percent multiplier, increasing his annual retirement to $50,000. Under current rules, his annual retirement would have been $56,000.
 
·                    Other items of note:
 
·                    New employees will have to work at least 15 years to be eligible for medical insurance, versus the current 10-year rule.
 
·                    No service purchases can be used to retire early.
 
·                    Their final average compensation must be based on their final five full fiscal years. Comp time is NOT included. Current employees only must have 48 months, and they can include comp time payments in their final average compensation.
 
·                    Sick-leave payments at retirement are limited to 12 months when calculating retirement benefits. Sick leave cannot be used to retire a year early.
 
Changes for NEW employees (Hazardous):
 
·                    They will continue to contribute 8 percent to their retirement, just as current hazardous-duty employees, but they will also pay the non-refundable 1 percent to a health insurance fund.
 
·                    They will have to work 25 years for full retirement, versus the current 20. They can retire whenever they reach that new total, no matter their age. In other words, there is no “Rule of 87” for new hazardous-duty hires. They can receive an unreduced retirement at age 60 with five years of service, which is currently 55 years of age with five years of service. Like current hazardous-duty employees, they can receive a reduced retirement at 50 years of age with 15 years of service.
 
·                    Their retirement multiplier also is based on a sliding scale. With 20 to 25 years of service, the multiplier would be 2.25 percent. That increases to 2.5 percent when the service is above 25 years. Unlike non-hazardous duty employees, this multiplier would cover all years of service, not just those above 25.
 
·                    Their retirement will still be based on a “high three” average salary, but it must be a full 36 months.
 
·                    Like new non-hazardous employees, it will take 15 years to qualify for medical insurance versus the current 10. Additionally, sick-leave payments will also be limited to 12 months when calculating retirement benefits.
 
Changes for New Teachers (hired after July 1st)
 
·                    Teachers currently have to pay 9.105 percent, which is refundable, into retirement and 0.75 percent into a non-refundable health fund. Teachers hired after July 1st will still pay the same retirement rate, but their health-fund contribution will rise to 1.75 percent. New university teachers will also pay the same to their pensions (7.625 percent), but will also see their non-refundable health insurance fund rise to 1.750 percent.
 
·                    These new teachers will still base their retirement on highest five years of earning, or their highest three if they have 27 years of service and are at least 55. Unlike current teachers, however, they will NOT be able to use comp-time and vacation days in their final retirement compensation.
 
·                    Their retirement multiplier will be somewhat lower for new teachers who do not reach full retirement. Those with 30 or more years teaching will still get a 3 percent multiplier.
 
·                    New teachers will have to work 10 instead of the current five years to retire with reduced benefits. The penalty on reduced benefits increases from five to six percent for each year short of unreduced retirement.
 
·                    Like every other new state and local government employee, they will have to work 15 years to qualify for health insurance.
 
·                    EXISTING TEACHERS will get an extra option if they decide to return to the classroom after retiring. They can waive their retirement at that point and add to their years of service, as if they had never retired. When they retire a second time, their benefit will be calculated using all of their service, not just the years they worked after the first retirement.
 
·                    For those curious why July 1st was chosen for teachers and not Sept. 1st, it is because new teachers will already be working in Sept., so if we did not include them immediately, it would be another year before KTRS could participate.
 
Other items:
 
·                    House and Senate leaders have agreed to create a subcommittee of State Government to provide legislative oversight. For example, there may be ways to increase retirement investment returns so they are close if not above the average of other retirement systems. Since the retirement systems (including KTRS) have $30 billion in assets, even a 1 percent increase in returns would bring in $300 million more.
 
·                    HB 1 is expected to substantially reduce the annual growth of the unfunded liability. That, coupled with increased employer payments as outlined in the bill, will ensure the solvency of the retirement systems.
 
·                    A working group formed by Governor Beshear is studying such unresolved issues as what other changes might need to be made and whether classified school employees should remain in the system covering city and county employees or be placed in another system.
 


The Legislature was called back into session this week by the Governor to address the fiscal problem of not enough money in the retirement fund for state employees now and certainly not enough for future employees.
 
House Bill 1, cosponsored by Rep. Mike Cherry, (D-Princeton) and the members of House leadership – Reps. Richards, Adkins, Hoffman, Clark and Wilkey sailed out of the House State Government Committee yesterday and looks on track to go to the Senate in time to finish the special session by the end of the week. Since it is the Governor’s bill, there seems no danger that he won’t sign it.
 
A similar attempt to amend the current retirement law, House Bill 600, was made by Mike Cherry in the Regular Session, but died a death of a thousand cuts as members of the House added amendments and the Senate came up with their own version of pension reform. A committee appointed by both Houses failed to reach consensus. It looks like they did talk to each other and ironed out their differences because HB 1, while similar to HB 600 is not as dense as its predecessor.
 
There is no legislative report on what the effect of HB 1 will be on local government available, nor was there an actuarial report on this bill. Both were prepared for HB 600. The Local Mandate  Fiscal Impact Estimate has some interesting stats that haven’t changed appreciably since it was presented in March, 2008 that have remained constant for HB 1.
  • County Employees Retirement System (CERS), which includes employees of county government and 223 of Kentucky 419 cities, has 135,706 active and retired participants.
  • The Kentucky League of Cities estimated that in the prior two years CERS retirement costs increased 33% and are projected to almost double by 2013.
  • The reduction of the cost of living allowance (COLA) from the current 3% to 1.5% will result in savings of $14 million for cities. For every 1% drop in the COLA, there is a 5.5 million reduction in the amount cities pay. One assumes that a similar savings will be realized by county governments.
  • The fiscal impact on local governments is expected to be minimal to moderate positive benefit in the 2008-2010 biennium and to have significant long term benefits.
  • Benefit restructuring for new hires will generate savings, but they will be a long time coming – since new hires will have to work additional years, their benefits will be lower and the COLA will be frozen at 1.5%.
  • For hazardous duty employees, the decrease will be 2.8% in employer contributed pension and 2.0% employer contribution for insurance benefits.
  • For nonhazardous duty employees, the employer contribution will be 1.83% less to pension benefits and 1.74% lower for insurance benefits.  
New employees will find their pension benefits less attractive than what their parents and grandparents received.  Retired employees returning to state government will no longer be able to come back to government and start a second retirement account. Creating the top salary years will take longer, the last five years, instead of the last three as in the current law.
 
The law allows twenty years to fully fund the retirement program (up from the optimistic ten year previous prediction.)
 
An actuarial report was prepared for HB 600. None is available for HB 1. Looking at the previous Actuarial Report, it notes that, as of 2003, reduced benefits already apply to new hires and it will take five to ten years to see an appreciable benefit from the change in the law. “In any event, the contribution necessary to amortize the current accrued unfunded  liability (VAL) of the various funds will not change, but will continue in the future until the VAL is completely funded.
 
The Actuarial Report concludes with
  • It is very unusual to have so many tiers in the benefit accrual system. This creates administrative burdens and does not provide more savings than the two tier system.
  • The multiple tiers will create bunching of retirements as employees wait to hit the next tier to get the significant increase in accrual rate on all service to date.
  • The savings associated will not materialize for many years until the active member group becomes heavily weighted with new hires.
 
Finally, the method of calculating sick leave will change. Employees will no longer be able to string together a long chain of sick leave to hasten their retirement date. Nor will they be able to buy the number of years retirement service back to add to their current years.
 
The bottom line seems to be there isn’t enough money in the retirement system to keep going as it is going. Since current employees by law cannot have their retirement benefits lessened, new employees will get fewer pension dollars, smaller increases based on inflation and will have to contribute more to their insurance.
 
This might fix the future. The state still will have to deal with thousands of current retirees and employees under the current system that will be entitled to the benefits they will be entitled to. With the stock market, the source of investment funds that was planned to fund the current system, going south, money to fund the liability will have to come from somewhere. That “somewhere” looks like the General Fund.
 
If HB 1 comes through the Senate unscathed, it is still just a start on the basic problem of too many baby boomers who came in together exiting together.
 
And we won’t even talk about what happens when they get really old and need long term care- at the expense of their insurance benefits from their former employer – the Commonwealth of Kentucky.  

Printer-friendly format




Do you know someone else who would like to see this?
Your Email:
Their Email:
Comment:
(Will be included with e-mail)
Secret Code

In the box below, enter the Secret Code exactly as it appears above *


 

website hit 
counter
Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: